Proposed uses of the new revenue that could be generated from developing assets in these communities include affordable housing, supports for small businesses, childcare access, transportation investments, and climate resilience. They are: the Annapolis and Anne Arundel County Resilience Authority, in Annapolis, Maryland, and Anne Arundel County, Maryland the City of Atlanta, Georgia the City of Chattanooga, Tennessee the City of Cleveland, Ohio Harris County, Texas and the City of Lancaster, California. The municipalities come from coast to coast, have leaders across the political spectrum, and have different priorities – but all see the promise in this innovation.
Selected candidates will now embark on a 10-month-long fact-finding mission to identify, map, and plan uses for underutilized assets in their respective jurisdictions that could be suitable for private investment, with social and environmental benefits to the communities. Proceeds come back to the community in the form of benefits like new bus routes connecting neighborhoods to jobs.
Through PAW, local governments identify underutilized assets like dormant parking lots and draw on public and private expertise to make them revenue-generating while government retains ownership. Newswise - SALT LAKE CITY - The Sorenson Impact Center, the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA, through its Rethinking Revenue initiative), and Urban3 today announced six jurisdictions have been selected for the inaugural Putting Assets to Work (PAW) Incubator. News Research News Releases Journal News Medical News Science News Life News Business News Expert Pitch Google Fact Check Research Alert Marketplace News With Video/Audio Multimedia RSS Feeds by Assigning the mom’s allele allows us to confidently include or exclude the sire’s contribution to the pup.Latest News Coronavirus News Currently Embargoed For each of the 99 markers in our parentage set, we compare the pup’s alleles to both of the parents’ alleles. Thus, a potential sire that has alleles 2,3 cannot be the dad in this case. If we use the mom in the analysis and find out that mom is 3,3, then she can only contribute a 3 allele to her pup, so the 1 allele must have come from the dad. We can’t assume that just because the father has a 3 allele that the 3 allele in the pup came from the dad. However, what if we didn’t use the dam’s sample? In another example, if the pup was 1,3 at marker B and the father was 2,3 at marker B, and the mom was not included in the testing, we don’t know if the 1 in the pup came from the mom or if the 3 in the pup came from the mom. If we based the parentage only on this single marker, we would conclude that the sire is the father. If the mother is 1,1 at marker A and the father is 2,3, at marker A, then we know that the 1 came from the mom because she only has alleles that have the 1 sequence and the 3 came from the father because he has alleles 2 and 3. For example, for marker “A”, the pup might be 1,3 one allele has sequence 1 and the other allele has a sequence that’s been designated as 3. The two alleles are each assigned a number based on their DNA sequence. For each marker, we get two results because the pup has two sets of DNA, one from the mom and one from the dad. For parentage (paternity) testing, we use a set of 99 informative markers to confirm or exclude a potential sire. Keep in mind that a pup receives half of its DNA from its mom and half of its DNA from its dad, so for every marker that we examine, the pup has one allele (gene copy) from mom and one allele (gene copy) from dad. Here is an example that helps explain why we need both parents for parentage testing. The simple answer is because we need to compare the DNA of the pup to both parents in order to confidently confirm or exclude a potential sire. 17, 2021Īt Paw Print Genetics, we are often asked this question: “Why do I need to send in a sample on the dam if I just want to know the father of my pups?”.
0 kommentar(er)
